GLP-1 Provider Quality Report 2026
Aggregate trust-score analysis of 7,093 NPI-verified U.S. GLP-1 providers across 47 states. National average 64.5/100. State rankings, the national top-50, channel comparison, and factor-level breakdown.
Published 2026-04-30 · Last updated 2026-05-01 · Licensed CC BY 4.0
Headline findings
The A-grade gap
Zero U.S. GLP-1 clinics (0%) earn an A-grade in 2026. The highest-scoring clinic in America reaches 74/100 (a B grade). Only 55.3% earn at least a B-, and 1.6% sit at D-grade.
The differentiator
Patient review volume is the only factor that meaningfully separates top from bottom clinics. Top-quartile clinics average 95.7/100 on review count (log-scaled) versus 45.6/100 in the bottom quartile (a 50.1-point gap). Other factors show single-digit differences or none at all.
Multi-channel lift
Clinics offering both telehealth and in-person care average 66.6/100 (791 clinics) versus 64.2/100 for in-person-only clinics (6,302 clinics), a 2.4-point lift.
Geographic spread
Nevada leads with an average trust score of 66.2/100 (67 clinics). Alaska ranks lowest at 58.8/100. The spread between top and bottom state averages is 7.4 points.
Findings reflect publishable trust scores (7,093 of 9,699 active clinics). Clinics with fewer than five populated input factors are excluded. See the methodology section for the full formula and exclusions.
The 50 highest-trust GLP-1 clinics in America
Ranked by composite trust score, with ties broken by data coverage and Google review count. All clinics on this list earn a B or B-grade. None reach A.
Showing top 10 of 50
| # | Clinic | Location | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medi-Weightloss Winter Park | WINTER PARK, FL | 74 | B |
| 2 | Med Spa NYC: Beso Aesthetics | NEW YORK, NY | 74 | B |
| 3 | Ivím Health | COLUMBUS, OH | 73 | B |
| 4 | Tri Valley Medical Weight Control | MURRIETA, CA | 73 | B |
| 5 | Figure Weight Loss | EDGEWOOD, KY | 73 | B |
| 6 | Nulevel Wellness | GILBERT, AZ | 73 | B |
| 7 | LifeRx.md, Inc. | CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP, NJ | 73 | B |
| 8 | St Pete Wellness & MedSpa | ST. PETERSBURG, FL | 73 | B |
| 9 | Revived Medical Aesthetics | CAMP HILL, PA | 73 | B |
| 10 | Glow Aesthetic Center Med Spa | LOS ANGELES, CA | 73 | B |
Average GLP-1 clinic trust score by state
States with at least ten scoreable clinics, ranked by average trust score. The top clinic shown is each state's highest-scoring provider.
Showing top 10 of 47
| # | State | Clinics | Avg | Median | Top clinic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nevada | 67 | 66.2 | 67 | Revival Health and Wellness(73) |
| 2 | Arizona | 175 | 66.1 | 67 | Saguaro Medical Weight Control, Semaglutide, Phentermine(73) |
| 3 | Florida | 613 | 65.8 | 66 | Medi-Weightloss Winter Park(74) |
| 4 | South Carolina | 166 | 65.8 | 67 | Restore Hyper Wellness(73) |
| 5 | Texas | 767 | 65.5 | 66 | Vitality Hormones and IV Bar(73) |
| 6 | Utah | 203 | 65.5 | 67 | Rise Rejuvenation Center(73) |
| 7 | Montana | 11 | 65.5 | 68 | Restore Hyper Wellness(73) |
| 8 | South Dakota | 29 | 65.4 | 66 | Encompass Wellness & Aesthetics(73) |
| 9 | Oklahoma | 90 | 65 | 66.5 | Revitalize Medical Spa(73) |
| 10 | Ohio | 265 | 64.9 | 65 | Optimize U - Cincinnati | Hormone and Cryotherapy Clinic(73) |
What separates a top-quartile clinic from a bottom-quartile one?
For each of the nine input factors, the average normalized score (0–100) in the top quartile vs the bottom quartile, with the delta. Factors are weighted 3% to 35% in the composite score.
| Factor | Weight | Top quartile | Bottom quartile | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google rating | 35% | 98.2 | 93.6 | +4.6 |
| Review count (log-scaled) | 25% | 95.7 | 45.6 | +50.1 |
| Photo gallery | 10% | 39.7 | 32.2 | +7.5 |
| GLP-1 medications offered | 8% | 30.4 | 30.2 | +0.2 |
| Business hours populated | 7% | 100 | 100 | +0 |
| Verification status | 5% | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| ABOM-certified provider | 4% | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| Listing claimed by owner | 3% | 0 | 0 | +0 |
| BBB accredited | 3% | 0 | 0 | +0 |
Verification, ABOM certification, claimed listings, and BBB accreditation show 0/0 in both quartiles because the underlying flags are extremely rare across the population. Fewer than 1% of GLP-1 clinics carry any of these credentials. The differentiation between strong and weak clinics is overwhelmingly driven by patient review volume.
National grade distribution
Letter grade share across all 7,093scored clinics. Grades map to score bands: A+ ≥90, A ≥85, A- ≥80, B+ ≥75, B ≥70, B- ≥65, C+ ≥60, C ≥55, C- ≥50, D <50.
| Grade | Clinics | Share | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| A+ | 0 | 0% | |
| A | 0 | 0% | |
| A- | 0 | 0% | |
| B+ | 0 | 0% | |
| B | 1,618 | 22.8% | |
| B- | 2,305 | 32.5% | |
| C+ | 1,820 | 25.7% | |
| C | 891 | 12.6% | |
| C- | 344 | 4.8% | |
| D | 115 | 1.6% |
Methodology
Click to expand: source population, trust score formula, inclusion criteria, quartile definition, exclusions, limitations, reproducibility.
Source population. Clinics are sourced from the CMS National Provider Identifier (NPI) Registry and Google Business profiles, then verified to have an active website mentioning weight loss or GLP-1 services. The directory contained 9,699 active clinics at the time of generation.
Trust score formula (v1.1.0). Each clinic receives a 0–100 composite trust score from nine weighted factors: Google rating (35%), review count log-scaled (25%), photo gallery (10%), GLP-1 medications offered (8%), business hours populated (7%), verification status (5%), ABOM-certified provider (4%), claimed listing (3%), and BBB accreditation (3%). Each input is normalized to a 0–100 scale before being multiplied by its weight and summed. The composite is rounded to an integer and mapped to a letter grade. See the full trust score methodology page for normalization details and a worked example.
Inclusion criteria.A clinic appears in this report only if it has at least five of nine input factors populated (data coverage ≥ 5). Clinics with sparse data are flagged as "incomplete" and excluded from rankings. State rollups exclude states with fewer than ten scoreable clinics. The national top-50 ranking breaks ties first by data coverage (more populated inputs preferred), then by Google review count.
Quartile definition. The factor analysis sorts all scored clinics by composite score descending. The top quartile is the upper 25% (scores in the top 25th percentile); the bottom quartile is the lower 25%. Per-factor averages within each quartile use the normalized 0–100 input value, not the weighted contribution.
What is excluded. Brand-name retail pricing, manufacturer self-pay programs, insurance coverage status, and patient outcome data are not part of this report. Quality here is measured as a consumer-facing trust score derived from publicly observable signals. It is not a clinical outcomes ranking.
Limitations. Self-reported clinic attributes (telehealth flag, medications offered, BBB accreditation) may be stale at the moment of computation. Google ratings and review counts reflect a snapshot at the most recent crawl. The model does not weight provider credentials beyond ABOM certification or correct for review-volume bias toward older, urban clinics. Scores are recomputed weekly.
Reproducibility. The full dataset (state rollups, top-50, channel stats, grade distribution, factor analysis) is published as a CC BY 4.0-licensed JSON file linked below. The trust-score formula version is included in every record for downstream verification.
License and citation
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). You may reproduce, adapt, and redistribute the data in any medium with attribution.
Download: glp1-provider-quality-2026.json (full dataset, ~87 KB)
Cite this page
Published under CC BY 4.0 — free to reuse with attribution. Pick the format you need.
GLP1 Clinics. (2026). GLP-1 Provider Quality Report 2026. Retrieved 2026-05-05, from https://www.glp1clinics.org/research/glp1-provider-quality-2026
According to GLP1 Clinics (2026)
<a href="https://www.glp1clinics.org/research/glp1-provider-quality-2026">GLP-1 Provider Quality Report 2026</a> — GLP1 Clinics (2026)
[GLP-1 Provider Quality Report 2026](https://www.glp1clinics.org/research/glp1-provider-quality-2026) — GLP1 Clinics (2026)
Related research
- GLP-1 Pricing Across U.S. States, 2026 · Telehealth tirzepatide and semaglutide median monthly pricing by state
- GLP-1 Telehealth Access by U.S. State, 2026 · Telehealth share, insurance acceptance, and medication availability across 49 states
- GLP-1 Clinic Landscape Report 2026 · Analysis of 9,580+ providers across all 50 states
- GLP1 Clinics Trust Score Methodology · 9-input weighted scoring system used to rate provider quality
